The GamblerStudy Guide

The General's circle has already spent the inheritance. They are waiting for a telegram that the Moscow grandmother is dead so the French debts can clear and Blanche can be paid in a wedding. Then the old woman arrives in an armchair, very much alive, and asks the way to the casino. Dostoevsky published the novella in 1866. Seeing the trap is not the same as leaving it. The tutor who can name every mechanism will still sit down at the wheel.

Alexei Ivanovich is a tutor in a Russian household stranded at a German spa called Roulettenburg: quick, proud, broke, and so sure that intensity counts as love that Polina's contempt feels like a form of attention. Polina Alexandrovna is the General's stepdaughter, used by the Marquis de Griers and using Alexei in turn, asking him to play her money and then to make a fool of himself in public. The General waits for his grandmother, Antonida Tarasevicheva, to die so he can marry Mlle Blanche and settle what he has already mortgaged. Mr. Astley, the English sugar refiner, sees the whole arrangement and cannot make anyone leave it. De Griers treats people as accounts, and Blanche prices a husband by the telegram.

Alexei enters the casino with Polina's six hundred gulden, angry at playing for someone else, and wins enough to mistake luck for a faculty. She then sends him to bow to a Baroness and speak broken French; he does it, and the household treats the insult as a scandal he chose. The grandmother arrives on the verandah, mocks De Griers as a mountebank, and asks to see roulette. She wins on zero, becomes imperious by dinner, and ruins herself in days. Alexei runs back to the tables to rescue Polina from De Griers, piles a fortune on the cloth, and brings it home; she throws the money at him and leaves. He burns the winnings in three weeks of Paris with Blanche. A year and eight months later Astley finds him at Homburg, reports that Polina inherited seven thousand pounds and that the General is dead, and still cannot buy him off the wheel.

Dostoevsky dictated the book in twenty-six days to Anna Snitkina because a contract would have stripped him of every future work if he missed the deadline, and because he already knew the tables from the inside. He never treats roulette as local colour, or the first win as a cute initiation. Compulsion here is not ignorance. It is a premise that survives evidence: the loss was an error, the next system will correct it, one hour of patience will raise the dead. What remains is not a sermon against risk. It is a picture of how a rescue fantasy, a humiliating attachment, and a public score can share one mechanism, and how intelligence will refine the method rather than abandon the premise.

Read the full summary on the book page →