Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to distinguish between leaders who perform authority and those who actually create change.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when someone takes credit for group success—ask yourself who really did the work and what conditions made the outcome possible.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Key Quotes & Analysis
"If it had depended on Napoleon's will to fight or not to fight the battle of Borodinó, and if this or that other arrangement depended on his will, then evidently a cold affecting the manifestation of his will might have saved Russia"
Context: Tolstoy is setting up his argument against the great man theory
This quote shows the absurdity of crediting individual leaders with massive historical outcomes. If Napoleon's personal health could change world history, then history isn't really about grand strategy or deep causes.
In Today's Words:
If one person's bad day could change everything, then maybe that person wasn't really in control to begin with.
"the valet who omitted to bring Napoleon his waterproof boots on the twenty-fourth would have been the savior of Russia"
Context: Taking the great man theory to its logical extreme
Tolstoy pushes the individual-focused view of history to show how ridiculous it becomes. A servant's forgetfulness becomes more important than the decisions of millions of people.
In Today's Words:
By this logic, the intern who forgot to charge the CEO's phone saved the company from a bad deal.
"But to men who do not admit that Russia was formed by the will of one man, Peter I, or that the French Empire was formed by the will of one man, Napoleon"
Context: Introducing the alternative view that collective forces shape history
Tolstoy is setting up his main argument that nations and empires arise from complex social forces, not individual genius. He's challenging readers to think beyond the great man narrative.
In Today's Words:
But if you don't buy into the idea that one person can single-handedly build or destroy entire countries...
Thematic Threads
Power
In This Chapter
Napoleon's authority is revealed as performance rather than actual control over events
Development
Evolved from earlier depictions of aristocratic power to show even military command is largely illusion
In Your Life:
You might mistake your boss's authority for actual control when systemic issues affect your workplace
Class
In This Chapter
Common soldiers' individual choices collectively shape history more than aristocratic commanders
Development
Continues theme of working people's hidden influence on major events
In Your Life:
Your daily work decisions have more collective impact than you realize, even if you get no credit
Identity
In This Chapter
Napoleon performs the role of great leader while actual leadership happens elsewhere
Development
Builds on theme of people playing expected social roles rather than authentic selves
In Your Life:
You might be performing competence or authority at work while feeling uncertain inside
Social Expectations
In This Chapter
Society needs to believe in great men, so it creates myths about individual influence
Development
Extends earlier themes about society's need for simple explanations and clear hierarchies
In Your Life:
Others expect you to have more control over outcomes than you actually do
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
According to Tolstoy, why does Napoleon's cold at Borodinó prove that individual leaders don't control historical events as much as we think?
analysis • surface - 2
Why did Napoleon's soldiers fight at Borodinó - because of his orders, or because of their own desperate circumstances?
analysis • medium - 3
Think about your workplace or family. Who gets credit for success, and who actually does the daily work that makes things function?
application • medium - 4
When something goes wrong in your life, how do you decide whether to blame an individual person or examine the larger circumstances that created the problem?
application • deep - 5
What does this chapter suggest about why we prefer simple explanations (like 'Napoleon had a cold') over complex ones (like analyzing supply chains and troop morale)?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Map the Invisible Power Structure
Choose a situation where you've seen someone get praised or blamed for an outcome. Draw two columns: 'Visible Leader' and 'Hidden Forces.' In the first column, list what the obvious person did. In the second, list all the behind-the-scenes people, circumstances, and systems that actually created the result. Look for patterns in who gets credit versus who does the work.
Consider:
- •Consider both positive outcomes (who really deserved the credit?) and negative ones (what forces beyond individual control contributed?)
- •Think about your own invisible contributions - where do you do essential work that goes unrecognized?
- •Notice whether the 'leader' was performing authority (looking decisive, staying calm) rather than actually controlling the outcome
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when you were either blamed for something beyond your control, or when your essential work went unrecognized while someone else got credit. How did that experience shape how you view leadership and responsibility?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 219: The Night Before Battle
Having demolished the myth of Napoleon's individual control over Borodinó, Tolstoy will continue exploring how historical forces really work, revealing the gap between how events appear to unfold and how they actually happen.
