Chapter 12
When to Stand Your Ground
OF CONSTANCY The law of resolution and constancy does not imply that we ought not, as much as in us lies, to decline and secure ourselves from the mischiefs and inconveniences that threaten us; nor, consequently, that we shall not fear lest they should surprise us: on the contrary, all decent and honest ways and means of securing ourselves from harms, are not only permitted, but, moreover, commendable, and the business of constancy chiefly is, bravely to stand to, and stoutly to suffer those inconveniences which are not possibly to be avoided. So that there is no supple motion of…
Public-domain chapter text, formatted for reading.
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Key Quotes & Analysis
"The law of resolution and constancy does not imply that we ought not, as much as in us lies, to decline and secure ourselves from the mischiefs and inconveniences that threaten us; nor, consequently, that we shall not fear lest they should surprise us: on the contrary, all decent and honest ways and means of securing ourselves from harms, are not only permitted, but, moreover, commendable, and the business of constancy chiefly is, bravely to stand to, and stoutly to suffer those inconveniences which are not possibly to be avoided."
Context: Opening definition of constancy
Avoidable harm and unavoidable harm require different responses.
In Today's Words:
Montaigne says constancy does not forbid protecting yourself from threats you can avoid; it chiefly means bearing hardships that cannot be escaped. Courage is not inviting every blow for show. Before you call yourself weak for stepping back, ask whether the fight was ever worth the cost.
"would it, then, be a reputed cowardice to overcome them by giving ground?” urging, at the same time, the authority of Homer, who commends in AEneas the science of flight."
Context: Mocking rigid definitions of valor
Strategic retreat can be victory.
In Today's Words:
Socrates asks whether winning by giving ground should count as cowardice. He challenges the idea that courage always looks like standing still in rank. In negotiations, projects, or arguments, a tactical step back can be how you actually win instead of exhausting yourself on a fixed position.
"Mens immota manet; lachrymae volvuntur inanes."
Context: Stoic model of steady mind with surface tears
Emotion on the surface need not corrupt judgment.
In Today's Words:
Virgil's line, cited here, says the mind stays unmoved though tears flow in vain on the surface. That is the Stoic ideal: feel the shock without letting it rewrite your choices. You can be shaken for a moment and still decide well once the first wave passes through you.
"I confess I cannot forbear starting when the rattle of a harquebuse thunders in my ears on a sudden, and in a place where I am not to expect it, which I have also observed in others, braver fellows than I."
Context: Personal admission about startle response
Even brave people flinch; recovery matters more.
In Today's Words:
Montaigne confesses he starts when a harquebus rattles suddenly, as he has seen in men braver than he. The body reacts before pride can pose for an audience. Do not confuse a reflex with your character; watch what you choose to do after the jolt passes.
Thematic Threads
Social Expectations
In This Chapter
Montaigne challenges society's rigid definition of courage as never backing down or showing fear
Development
Building on earlier themes of questioning conventional wisdom about how people should behave
In Your Life:
You might feel pressure to appear strong in situations where admitting uncertainty would actually be wiser
Personal Growth
In This Chapter
Growth comes from learning to separate natural human responses from character flaws
Development
Continues Montaigne's theme of self-acceptance while still striving for improvement
In Your Life:
You can acknowledge your fears and limitations without seeing them as personal failures
Identity
In This Chapter
Montaigne shows how true identity remains constant even when tactics change
Development
Deepens earlier exploration of authentic self versus social performance
In Your Life:
You can adapt your approach to different situations without compromising who you are
Human Relationships
In This Chapter
Strategic retreat and flexibility strengthen rather than weaken relationships
Development
Introduced here as counterpoint to rigid social expectations
In Your Life:
Your relationships might improve when you choose cooperation over always being right
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
This is not a test. Five prompts guide you through the chapter, from how it opens to how it closes, so you notice context and rhythm rather than facts to memorize. Sit with each question in your own words. When you see "One way to read it," treat it as a starting point, not the only answer.
- 1
How does Montaigne use the Scythians' response to Darius to challenge traditional ideas about courage?
analysis • surfaceOne way to read it
The Scythians refused direct battle not from cowardice but as smart strategy, showing courage can mean choosing your battles rather than accepting every challenge.
- 2
Why does Montaigne distinguish between the Stoic philosopher's startle response and his judgment remaining intact?
analysis • mediumOne way to read it
He shows that wisdom isn't about suppressing natural reactions but preventing temporary emotions from corrupting our decision-making process.
- 3
Where do you see people today confusing stubbornness with strength in ways Montaigne would question?
application • mediumOne way to read it
In workplace conflicts where people refuse to compromise on minor points, or relationships where admitting fault feels like weakness rather than wisdom.
- 4
How would you apply Montaigne's cannon-dodging examples to handling criticism or conflict in your own life?
application • deepOne way to read it
Sometimes stepping back from immediate confrontation allows for better long-term positioning, like taking time to cool down before responding to harsh feedback.
- 5
What does Montaigne's view of fear and constancy reveal about the relationship between vulnerability and strength?
reflection • deepOne way to read it
True strength includes acknowledging our natural vulnerabilities while maintaining clear judgment, suggesting that denying human limitations actually weakens us.
Critical Thinking Exercise
Map Your Battle Choices
Think of three current conflicts or challenges in your life - at work, home, or in relationships. For each one, write down whether you're currently approaching it with rigid resistance or strategic flexibility. Then identify what you're really trying to protect or achieve in each situation.
Consider:
- •Ask yourself: Is this about my ego or my actual interests?
- •Consider: What would stepping back strategically look like here?
- •Evaluate: Which battles are worth fighting and which are distractions?
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when you stayed rigid in a situation where flexibility would have served you better. What were you afraid would happen if you bent? Looking back, what would you do differently now?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 13: The Art of Social Protocol
From constancy in battle Montaigne turns to ceremony between princes. He examines who waits for whom at formal meetings, and how etiquette can become slavery at home.





