Comfort That Prosecutes
Eliphaz opens with a compliment that is also a trap: Job used to strengthen weak hands; now the same trouble has touched him and he faints. Then the rule: who ever perished, being innocent? They that plow iniquity reap the same. A night spirit is produced as evidence. The explanation protects Eliphaz. If innocence never perishes, his own house is still under warranty.
Key Insight
The first inadequate explanation is almost always: you caused this. It lets the speaker keep a controllable world. Compassion would have stopped at the weak hands.
“Remember, I pray thee, who ever perished, being innocent? or where were the righteous cut off?”Explore full theme analysis






