Chapter 11
Why Religious Institutions Are the Most Secure Power Structures in Existence
CONCERNING ECCLESIASTICAL PRINCIPALITIES It only remains now to speak of ecclesiastical principalities, touching which all difficulties are prior to getting possession, because they are acquired either by capacity or good fortune, and they can be held without either; for they are sustained by the ancient ordinances of religion, which are so all-powerful, and of such a character that the principalities may be held no matter how their princes behave and live. These princes alone have states and do not defend them; and they have subjects and do not rule them; and the states, although unguarded, are not taken from them,…
Public-domain chapter text, formatted for reading.
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Key Quotes & Analysis
"for they are sustained by the ancient ordinances of religion, which are so all-powerful, and of such a character that the principalities may be held no matter how their princes behave and live."
Context: Why ecclesiastical states are easy to keep
Institutional religion supplies legitimacy ordinary princes must constantly defend.
In Today's Words:
Ecclesiastical states look untouchable because ancient religious authority carries legitimacy ordinary rulers must constantly defend. Machiavelli almost stops there, then explains how the papacy still had to build temporal power through money, arms, and faction control. Some thrones look secure on doctrine alone, but worldly greatness still has to be constructed the hard way.
"to keep down the Pope they made use of the barons of Rome, who, being divided into two factions, Orsini and Colonnesi, had always a pretext for disorder, and, standing with arms in their hands under the eyes of the Pontiff, kept the pontificate weak and powerless. And although there might arise sometimes a courageous pope, such as Sixtus, yet neither fortune nor wisdom could rid him of these annoyances. And the short life of a pope is also a cause of weakness; for in the ten years, which is the average life of a pope, he can with difficulty lower one of the factions; and if, so to speak, one people should almost destroy the Colonnesi, another would arise hostile to the Orsini, who would support their opponents, and yet would not have time to ruin the Orsini. This was the reason why the temporal powers of the pope were little esteemed in Italy."
Context: Why the papacy was weak before Alexander
Rival factions inside the institution kept temporal papal power contemptible until a pope broke the pattern with arms and money.
In Today's Words:
Before Alexander VI, Roman barons and faction cardinals kept the papacy politically weak even when individual popes were bold. Short reigns made breaking factions nearly impossible. If your institution has armed internal sponsors, even a strong leader may not live long enough to break them unless you control patronage at the source.
"Alexander the Sixth arose afterwards, who of all the pontiffs that have ever been showed how a pope with both money and arms was able to prevail; and through the instrumentality of the Duke Valentino, and by reason of the entry of the French, he brought about all those things which I have discussed above in the actions of the duke. And although his intention was not to aggrandize the Church, but the duke, nevertheless, what he did contributed to the greatness of the Church, which, after his death and the ruin of the duke, became the heir to all his labours."
Context: Alexander's accidental institutional gain
Private ambition executed through institutional tools can still enlarge the institution when the operator falls.
In Today's Words:
Alexander built for his son, but when Borgia fell the Church kept the machinery. Julius then used that inheritance openly for the institution itself. Private operators can enlarge an organization through ambition, yet the institution outlives them when the tools they built were bigger than their personal project.
"not allowing them to have their own cardinals, who caused the disorders among them. For whenever these factions have their cardinals they do not remain quiet for long, because cardinals foster the factions in Rome and out of it, and the barons are compelled to support them, and thus from the ambitions of prelates arise disorders and tumults among the barons."
Context: Julius controls Roman factions
Institutional power also means controlling the patronage nodes that feed internal war.
In Today's Words:
Alexander built for his son, but when Borgia fell the Church kept the machinery. Julius then used that inheritance openly for the institution itself. Private operators can enlarge an organization through ambition, yet the institution outlives them when the tools they built were bigger than their personal project.
Thematic Threads
Institutional Authority
In This Chapter
Machiavelli explores leadership backed by established institutions
Development
This theme connects to the broader analysis of power throughout the work
In Your Life:
Consider how bureaucracy, church-like structures, automatic legitimacy appear in your own professional environment
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
This is not a test. Five prompts guide you through the chapter, from how it opens to how it closes, so you notice context and rhythm rather than facts to memorize. Sit with each question in your own words. When you see "One way to read it," treat it as a starting point, not the only answer.
- 1
Why are ecclesiastical states easier to hold than other principalities, according to Machiavelli?
analysis • surfaceOne way to read it
They rest on ancient religious ordinances so powerful that subjects tolerate princes who neither defend nor actively rule. The states endure unguarded because people lack both the desire and the ability to break away. Machiavelli treats this as unique and stops short of analyzing it as ordinary politics.
- 2
How did Alexander VI and Julius II transform the papacy from a weak office into a temporal power?
analysis • mediumOne way to read it
Alexander used money, arms, and Cesare Borgia to break baronial factions and expand territory; the Church inherited the gains after Valentino fell. Julius found the Romagna held, factions weakened, and revenue methods in place, then pushed further against Bologna, Venice, and France while keeping Orsini and Colonnesi in check.
- 3
What role did faction cardinals and Roman barons play in keeping earlier popes politically weak?
analysis • deepOne way to read it
Orsini and Colonnesi barons stood armed under the pope's eyes, while their cardinals fostered disorder inside and outside Rome. A pope's short life made it hard to destroy one faction before another revived. Temporal power stayed slight until popes denied barons their own cardinals and broke the faction system.
- 4
Where do modern institutions rely on ancient legitimacy while still needing money, force, and faction control?
application • mediumOne way to read it
Think of long-established brands, universities, churches, or constitutional offices that draw authority from tradition but still require budgets, loyal staff, and management of internal rivalries to stay powerful in practice.
- 5
Does Machiavelli admire how the papacy was built, or merely record that sacred authority still required worldly methods?
reflection • deepOne way to read it
He records more than he praises. After calling ecclesiastical rule too exalted for full analysis, he still explains the papacy's rise through arms, money, faction-breaking, and succession. Sacred status did not remove the need for ordinary instruments of power.
Critical Thinking Exercise
Applying Institutional Authority
Analyze a current challenge in your professional life through the lens of leadership backed by established institutions.
Consider:
- •How does institutional authority affect your situation?
- •What strategic options does understanding bureaucracy, church-like structures, automatic legitimacy reveal?
Journaling Prompt
How might a deeper understanding of bureaucracy, church-like structures, automatic legitimacy change your approach to leadership?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 12: Why Mercenaries Will Betray You at the Worst Possible Moment
In the next chapter, Machiavelli turns to another crucial aspect of power and leadership...
