Chapter 05
When to Trust Your Enemy
WHETHER THE GOVERNOR OF A PLACE BESIEGED OUGHT HIMSELF TO GO OUT TO PARLEY Quintus Marcius, the Roman legate in the war against Perseus, King of Macedon, to gain time wherein to reinforce his army, set on foot some overtures of accommodation, with which the king being lulled asleep, concluded a truce for some days, by this means giving his enemy opportunity and leisure to recruit his forces, which was afterwards the occasion of the king’s final ruin. Yet the elder senators, mindful of their forefathers’ manners, condemned this proceeding as degenerating from their ancient practice, which, they said, was…
Public-domain chapter text, formatted for reading.
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Key Quotes & Analysis
"it was reputed a victory of less glory to overcome by force than by fraud."
Context: Roman honor versus Greek and Punic cunning
Some cultures prized how you won as much as whether you won.
In Today's Words:
Montaigne notes that among Greeks and Carthaginians, winning by fraud carried less glory than winning by force. Teams still argue about whether a clever shortcut counts as real success. Know which culture you are in before you copy a tactic that will poison the story later.
"he only confesses himself overcome who knows he is neither subdued by policy nor misadventure, but by dint of valour, man to man, in a fair and just war."
Context: Roman ideal of honorable defeat
Defeat mattered morally only if won fairly, not by trick or bad luck.
In Today's Words:
Montaigne says a man truly admits defeat only when beaten by valor in a fair fight, not by trickery or accident. That is why losing to a rigged process feels different from losing on merit. Before you accept shame, separate bad luck and manipulation from a clean contest.
"a governor of a place never ought, in a time of siege, to go out to parley."
Context: Modern military caution about negotiation
Parley is the moment when defenders are most exposed.
In Today's Words:
Montaigne reports a later rule that a besieged governor should not go out to parley during a siege. The talk itself is the danger zone. When someone asks you to leave your documented process for a private chat, treat that as a red flag, not a compliment to your reasonableness.
"I shall never think any man greater than myself whilst I have my sword in my hand,” and would not consent to come out to him till first, according to his own demand, Antigonus had delivered him his own nephew Ptolomeus in hostage."
Context: Refusal to parley without a hostage
Eumenes ties dignity to retained leverage, not empty bravado.
In Today's Words:
Eumenes tells Antigonus he will not consider any man greater while he still holds his sword in hand, and he demands a hostage before meeting face to face. That is leverage preserved, not empty theatrics. Keep your equivalent protections in place before you agree to talk on someone else's terms.
Thematic Threads
Trust
In This Chapter
Montaigne shows how trust becomes weaponized when someone asks you to prove your good faith by giving up your advantages
Development
Introduced here
In Your Life:
You might see this when someone asks you to 'trust them' by removing the very protections that would ensure that trust is warranted
Honor
In This Chapter
Ancient Romans valued honor so highly they'd return enemy spies, but Montaigne questions whether rigid honor codes become strategic weaknesses
Development
Introduced here
In Your Life:
You might struggle with this when being 'the bigger person' actually enables someone to take advantage of you
Power
In This Chapter
The chapter explores how power dynamics shift when commanders leave their fortresses—and how this applies to any negotiation
Development
Introduced here
In Your Life:
You might experience this when someone asks you to meet on 'neutral ground' that's actually more favorable to them
Deception
In This Chapter
Montaigne contrasts obvious lies with sophisticated manipulation that exploits our virtues against us
Development
Introduced here
In Your Life:
You might encounter this when someone frames their request as being about your character rather than their advantage
Strategy
In This Chapter
The essay teaches strategic thinking—how to maintain integrity while recognizing when others are playing a different game
Development
Introduced here
In Your Life:
You might need this when balancing being a good person with protecting your legitimate interests
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
This is not a test. Five prompts guide you through the chapter, from how it opens to how it closes, so you notice context and rhythm rather than facts to memorize. Sit with each question in your own words. When you see "One way to read it," treat it as a starting point, not the only answer.
- 1
Why did ancient Roman senators condemn Quintus Marcius for using fake peace talks to buy time against Perseus?
analysis • surfaceOne way to read it
They believed true victory required defeating enemies through courage in open battle, not through deception or trickery. Honor mattered more than winning.
- 2
Why does Montaigne contrast Roman honor with modern warfare where 'we must eke out the lion's skin with a bit from that of a fox'?
analysis • mediumOne way to read it
He shows how survival pressures force us to abandon pure principles. Sometimes cunning becomes necessary when honor alone isn't enough to protect what matters.
- 3
Where do you see people today getting trapped by their own sense of fairness or honor in negotiations?
application • mediumOne way to read it
Business deals where one side plays by ethical rules while the other manipulates. Or relationships where honest people get exploited by those faking good intentions.
- 4
How would you handle a situation where someone asks you to step outside your position of strength to 'talk things over'?
application • deepOne way to read it
Like Eumenes demanding a hostage first, I'd require proof of good faith before leaving my advantage. Trust needs verification, especially when stakes are high.
- 5
What does Henry de Vaux's story reveal about the difference between courage and wisdom in trusting others?
reflection • deepOne way to read it
Sometimes trusting an enemy shows wisdom, not weakness. The key is reading the situation correctly and ensuring the other party has genuine reasons to keep faith.
Critical Thinking Exercise
Map Your Personal Fortress
Think of a current situation where you hold some leverage - maybe a job negotiation, family decision, or personal boundary. Write down what your 'fortress' is (your sources of strength and protection), then imagine someone asking you to step away from those advantages 'for fairness.' What would they gain? What would you lose?
Consider:
- •Your fortress might be documentation, witnesses, legal protections, or simply time to think
- •Notice how reasonable requests can mask strategic moves
- •Consider whether the conversation truly requires you to abandon your position
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when you gave up a position of strength to seem reasonable or fair. What happened? What would you do differently now, knowing what you know?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 6: When Negotiations Turn Deadly
Montaigne moves from who should parley to the hour of parley itself. He examines why the moment talks begin is especially dangerous, and how leaders protect themselves when words become weapons.
