Chapter 27
The Nature of True Friendship
OF FRIENDSHIP Having considered the proceedings of a painter that serves me, I had a mind to imitate his way. He chooses the fairest place and middle of any wall, or panel, wherein to draw a picture, which he finishes with his utmost care and art, and the vacuity about it he fills with grotesques, which are odd fantastic figures without any grace but what they derive from their variety, and the extravagance of their shapes. And in truth, what are these things I scribble, other than grotesques and monstrous bodies, made of various parts, without any certain figure, or…
Public-domain chapter text, formatted for reading.
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Key Quotes & Analysis
"because it was he, because it was I."
Context: Asked why he loved La Boétie
Perfect friendship defies accounting.
In Today's Words:
Asked why he loved La Boétie, Montaigne says it could only be expressed by answering because it was he, because it was I. Some bonds are not built from reasons you can list. If you can fully explain why you trust someone, you may be describing convenience, not friendship.
"one soul in two bodies (according to that very proper definition of Aristotle), they can neither lend nor give anything to one another."
Context: Definition of perfect friendship
Union without remainder.
In Today's Words:
Montaigne uses Aristotle's phrase one soul in two bodies for the friendship he means. Wills, goods, and sorrows were common between them. That is not a metaphor for every close friend you have; it names a bond so total that division or rivalry sounds absurd.
"friendship that possesses the whole soul, and there rules and sways with an absolute sovereignty, cannot possibly admit of a rival."
Context: Why true friendship admits no rival
Whole-soul love is exclusive.
In Today's Words:
Montaigne says the friendship that possesses the whole soul cannot admit a rival. Lesser ties can be divided among many people and qualities. When you try to give that total bond to more than one person at once, you usually dilute it into ordinary acquaintance.
"From the day that I lost him: “Quern semper acerbum, Semper honoratum (sic, di, voluistis) habebo,” [“A day for me ever sad, for ever sacred, so have you willed ye gods."
Context: Grief after La Boétie's death
Loss halves the self.
In Today's Words:
From the day he lost La Boétie, Montaigne says he has led only a languishing life. Four years of that friendship outweighed everything else. When someone shaped your inner life that deeply, their absence is not a single loss but a change in who you are.
Thematic Threads
Authentic Connection
In This Chapter
Montaigne distinguishes between different types of human bonds, showing that true friendship transcends all other relationships through complete mutual understanding
Development
Introduced here
In Your Life:
You recognize this in relationships where you can be completely yourself without performance or editing.
Social Expectations
In This Chapter
He systematically rejects society's prescribed relationship categories—family duty, romantic passion, marital contract—as inadequate for describing true connection
Development
Builds on earlier themes about rejecting social conventions when they don't serve authentic living
In Your Life:
You feel this tension when people expect certain relationships to fulfill roles they simply can't.
Loss and Grief
In This Chapter
Montaigne describes feeling like half a person after La Boétie's death, showing how profound connection changes our very sense of self
Development
Introduced here
In Your Life:
You understand this if you've lost someone who truly knew you and felt like part of yourself died with them.
Identity
In This Chapter
Through friendship, Montaigne discovers that identity isn't fixed—he becomes 'one soul in two bodies,' showing how deep connection transforms who we are
Development
Deepens ongoing exploration of how we become ourselves through relationships and experience
In Your Life:
You recognize this when certain people bring out aspects of yourself that no one else does.
Human Relationships
In This Chapter
He creates a hierarchy of human bonds, showing that not all connections are equal and that the rarest form—soul friendship—is qualitatively different from all others
Development
Builds on earlier observations about human nature, now focusing specifically on the spectrum of human connection
In Your Life:
You see this in how different people in your life serve different purposes and reach different depths of knowing you.
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
This is not a test. Five prompts guide you through the chapter, from how it opens to how it closes, so you notice context and rhythm rather than facts to memorize. Sit with each question in your own words. When you see "One way to read it," treat it as a starting point, not the only answer.
- 1
Why does Montaigne reject family bonds, romantic love, and marriage as examples of true friendship?
analysis • surfaceOne way to read it
He argues each involves obligation, instability, or competing interests rather than pure choice. Family ties are duties, love is passionate but fleeting, marriage involves contracts and practical concerns.
- 2
Why does Montaigne's claim that souls 'efface the seam that joined them' capture something family relationships cannot?
analysis • mediumOne way to read it
Family bonds maintain hierarchy and distance even in love. True friendship dissolves all barriers between separate selves, creating complete understanding without roles or duties interfering.
- 3
Where do you see people today confusing close relationships with the kind of friendship Montaigne describes?
application • mediumOne way to read it
Social media 'best friends,' work partnerships, or even marriages often lack the soul-level recognition Montaigne describes. People mistake shared activities or mutual benefit for deep connection.
- 4
How would you recognize if you met someone who could become this kind of friend versus someone who's just compatible?
application • deepOne way to read it
Montaigne suggests immediate, inexplicable recognition rather than gradual compatibility. You'd feel understood completely without explanation, like meeting another version of yourself with different experiences.
- 5
What does Montaigne's grief over La Boetie reveal about how rare connections shape our capacity for other relationships?
reflection • deepOne way to read it
Once you experience complete understanding with another soul, other relationships feel incomplete by comparison. The deepest connections don't just add to life but fundamentally change how we relate to everyone else.
Critical Thinking Exercise
Map Your Connection Types
Create a simple diagram of your important relationships. Draw circles for different people and label each connection type: family obligation, work collaboration, shared activity, romantic partnership, or soul recognition. Notice which categories have the most circles and which feel most energizing to you.
Consider:
- •Most relationships serve specific purposes and that's perfectly normal
- •Soul recognition connections are rare - you might only have one or two in a lifetime
- •Energy flows differently in constructed versus recognized connections
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when you felt completely understood by someone. How did that change how you approached other relationships? What did it teach you about what you're looking for in human connection?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 28: Love Letters from a Lost Friend
Montaigne follows his tribute with poetry La Boétie left behind. Twenty-nine rough love sonnets survive, preserved and forwarded though they are not the work he would have chosen to immortalize.
